Sample Test Questions - 3 -
Sample Test Questions - 3 -
Figure 1
- As currently depicted the oligopolist depicted in Figure 1 has
economic profits of:
- $750 million.
- $250 million.
- $350 million.
- $600 million.
- $500 million.
Answer to Question 1
- If the marginal cost curve shifts up by $10 at every level of
output, the oligopolist depicted in Figure 1 will:
- reduce output and increase price.
- increase his price but leave output the same.
- leave price the same but reduce output.
- operate at a loss.
- leave price and output levels unchanged.
Answer to Question 2
- The reason for the shape of the demand curve depicted in Figure
1 is the firm's belief that:
- if it increases or lowers price, all other firms will follow.
- if it reduces price other firms will enter the industry, but if
it increases price firms will exit.
- if it increases price other firms will enter the industry, but
if it reduces price firms will exit.
- if it reduces price, all other firms will follow, but if it increases
price no other firms will.
- if it reduces price, no other firms will follow, but if it increases
price all other firms will.
Answer to Question 3
- If there are no externalities, the allocatively efficient level
of output for the firm depicted in Figure 1 would be:
- more than 12 million.
- 10 million.
- 5 million.
- less than 5 million.
- between 5 and 10 million.
Answer to Question 4
- Publishing companies typically charge libraries higher subscription
rates than individuals for technical journals. (By technical journals
we mean publications where articles are written by experts in
a field for other experts such as the New England Journal of Medicine or the Molecular Biology or the American Economic Review.) For example in 1990 a personal subscription to the Journal of Econometrics was about $160.00 per year while the library rate was around
$650 per year. The best explanation for this is that:
- it actually cost more to print journals for libraries than for
individuals so the price difference reflects true cost differences.
- libraries have more inelastic demands for technical journals that
individuals so the publishers are able to engage in price discrimination.
- libraries have more elastic demands for technical journals than
individuals so the publishers are able to engage in price discrimination.
- individuals need the journals more so the publishers gives them
a break.
- the publisher is charging a ''price per reader'' rather than a
price per journal.
Figure 2
Answer to Question 5
- Suppose Madison Widget Inc., a monopolist in the Widget market,
faces the demand curve shown in Figure 2. What equation gives
Madison Widget Inc.'s marginal revenue?
- .
- .
- .
- .
- .
Answer to Question 6
- For Madison Widget the profit maximizing output and price choice
is:
- to produce 8 units and charge a price of $2.
- to produce 8 units and charge a price of $6.
- to produce 10 units and charge a price of $2.
- to produce 10 units and charge a price of $5.
- to produce 6 units and charge a price of $7.
Answer to Question 7
- The monopolist's profit in the previous question:
- is $2,000 per year.
- is $3,000 per year.
- is $4,000 per year.
- is $8,000 per year.
- can not be computed with the given information.
Answer to Question 8
Figure 3
- The payoff matrix given in Figure 3 describes the situation faced
by two firms in the same industry in deciding whether or not to
advertise. The payoffs are profits. If the firms have to make
a decision once and for all time about advertising you should
predict that:
- both firms 1 and 2 will play their dominant strategies and earn
profits of 40 each.
- both firms will flip a coin to decide what to do.
- both firms 1 and 2 will play their dominant strategies and earn
profits of 20 each.
- our best prediction is that the outcome will be the Nash equilibirum
where each earns profits of 40.
- the firms will collude and both agree to advertise.
Answer to Question 9
Figure 4
- The payoff matrix given in Figure 4 describes the situation faced
by two firms in a different industry than in the previous question.
The payoffs are profits. If the firms have to make a decision
once and for all time about advertising you should predict that:
- both firms 1 and 2 will play their dominant strategies and earn
profits of 40 each.
- both firms will flip a coin to decide what to do.
- both firms 1 and 2 will play their dominant strategies and earn
profits of 20 each.
- our best prediction is that the outcome will be the Nash equilibirum
where each earns profits of 40.
- the firms will collude and both agree to advertise.
Answer to Question 10
- Consider two industries, one in which the four firm concentration
ratio is .95 and another in which the four firm concentration
ratio is .12. From this information alone you might predict that:
- tacit collusion will be easier in the industry with the concentration
ratio of .12 and thus we expect profits in that industry to be
lower.
- tacit collusion will be easier in the industry with the concentration
ratio of .95 and thus we expect profits in that industry to be
higher.
- tacit collusion will be easier in the industry with the concentration
ratio of .12 and thus we expect profits in that industry to be
higher.
- explicit collusion will be easier in the industry with the concentration
ratio of .12 and thus we expect profits in that industry to be
higher.
- tacit collusion is unrelated to the four firm concentration ratio
and thus we can make no good prediction about profits in these
two industries.
Answer to Question 11
Figure 5
- Refer to the payoff matrix in Figure 5. If the game is played
only once, the outcome we predict is that:
- both firms will play their dominant strategies and each will earn
profits of 10.
- both firms will play their dominant strategies and each will earn
profits of 6
- Firm 1 will charge a low price and Firm 2 will charge a high price.
- Since there is no dominant strategy we can't make a prediction.
- Firm 2 will charge a low price and Firm 1 will charge a high price.
Answer to Question 12
Figure 6
- Consider the payoff matrix shown in Figure 6. It describes a situation
in which two firms are trying to decide what color to paint their
products next year. From the payoffs we know that:
- firm 1 likes green and firm 2 likes red.
- neither firm cares about color, they just want to be different
from each other.
- firm 1 likes red and firm 2 likes green.
- the firms don't care about color, but firm 1 wants to be different
from firm 2 and firm 2 wants to be like firm 1.
- the firms don't care about color, but firm 1 wants to be like
firm 2 and firm 2 wants to be different from firm 1.
Answer to Question 13
- Consider the payoff matrix shown in Figure 6. It describes a situation
in which two firms are trying to decide what color to paint their
products next year. When playing this game repeatedly the outcome
we predict is:
- each firm plays its dominant strategy and gets a payoff of 20.
- each firm chooses its pure strategy Nash equilibrium play.
- each firm pursues a mixed strategy.
- firm one always plays green and firm two always plays red.
- firm one always plays red and firm two always plays green.
Answer to Question 14
Figure 7
- What is the smallest value for X in Figure 7 such that Firm 1 playing Low and Firm
2 playing High is a Nash equilibrium?
- 8.
- 7.
- 5.
- 4.
- 3.
Answer to Question 15
- What is the largest value for X in Figure 7 such that we can predict that if the
game is played only once Firm 1 will play High and Firm 2 will
play Low ?
- 9.
- 8.
- 7.
- 5.
- 4.
Answer to Question 16
- Suppose the DeBeers corporation has a virtual world--wide monopoly
of the gem quality diamond trade. Suppose the jewelry and wedding
industries combine their advertising dollars to successfully convince
young lovers that diamonds are not only the best way to express
affection, but that possession of diamonds is an important part
of self--esteem and personal validation. (After all, the message
inherent in the "shadow/silhouette diamond commercials is that
diamonds, not people, matter). If this campaign is successful
and the businesses behave as profit maximizing monopolists, we
predict the following:
- An increase in the average price of diamonds an increase in the
quantity sold and an increase in profits.
- An increase in the average price of diamonds a decrease in the
quantity sold and an increase in profits.
- No change in the average price of diamonds an increase in the
quantity sold and an increase in profits.
- A decrease in the average price of diamonds a decrease in the
quantity sold and an increase in profits.
- A decrease in the average price of diamonds an increase in the
quantity sold and an increase in profits.
Answer to Question 17
TABLE 1 |
Data For Firm A |
Price |
Units Sold |
10 |
100 |
9.95 |
101 |
9.90 |
102 |
9.85 |
103 |
9.80 |
104 |
9.75 |
105 |
9.70 |
106 |
9.65 |
107 |
9.60 |
108 |
- Suppose you are hired as a manager for a firm that has an effective
monopoly in a some market. At your request the marketing research
group in your firm generates the information in Table 1 for you.
Current sales are 100 units (per minute) and your firm is selling
its output at $10.00 per unit. The cost analysis group estimates
that your firm's current marginal cost of producing its product
is $4.82 per unit. Hoping to look good in your next review you
propose that your firm do the following to increase profits.
- Raise price by a lot. Since marginal cost is less than half the
price, it will be profitable to increase prices by a great deal.
- Reduce price by almost $5.20 so that price will be close to marginal
cost, which will maximize the monopoly profit.
- Reduce price to $9.95 because that is just barely lower than current
and will split the marginal cost versus marginal benefit difference.
- Reduce price to $9.90 since that will set the added revenue just
slightly above the additional costs of production.
- Reduce price to $9.60 since that will set the added revenue just
slightly above the additional costs of production.
-
Answer to Question 18
- Suppose after you make your suggestion based on the information
in the last question you are told that the firm legal department
just sent a fax indicating that the annual non-refundable retainer
they pay to a Wall Street legal firm which handles much of your
firm's legal work has been increased by an extra $100,000 per
year. Based on this information you change your recommendation
in the following way.
- You recommend that prices be increased more than before in the
hopes of passing the costs of the retainer along to your customers.
- You recommend that prices be lowered more than before so the extra
sales will make up for the extra costs.
- You recommend the same price you recommended before since this
extra cost is not related to the number of units your firm produces.
- You recommend that the firm find a new demand curve so that prices
and quantities can be recomputed.
- You recommend that price be the same but that output be doubled
in the hope of earning extra revenue.
Answer to Question 19
Figure 8
- For the monopolistically competitive firm depicted in Figure 8
the profit maximizing quantity and price are:
- Q=10, P = 23
- Q = 15, P = 27
- Q = 15, P = 20
- Q = 25, P = 15
- Q = 25, P = 18
Answer to Question 20
- As depicted, this firm in Figure 8 is earning an economic profit
of:
- 105
- 75
- -105
- -255
- -75
Answer to Question 21
- Compared with the results in the diagram above, in the long run,
in a market with free entry, the firm in Figure 8 will:
- Charge a higher price and produce a larger quantity
- Charge a higher price and produce a smaller quantity
- Charge a lower price and produce a smaller quantity
- Charge a lower price and produce a larger quantity
- The long run result is the same as original result
Answer to Question 22
Figure 9
- Suppose the firm depicted in Figure 9 is a firm in a monopolistically
competitive industry. At the profit maximizing level of price
and output for this firm:
- consumers will be willing to pay $6 for one more unit of the good
while it would cost the firm $4.50 to product another unit.
- consumers will be willing to pay $5 for one more unit of the good
while it would cost the firm $5.00 to product another unit.
- consumers will be willing to pay $5 for one more unit of the good
while it would cost the firm $4.50 to product another unit.
- consumers will be willing to pay $10 for one more unit of the
good while it would cost the firm $5.00 to product another unit.
- consumers will be willing to pay $10 for one more unit of the
good while it would cost the firm $3.00 to product another unit.
Answer to Question 23
- At the profit maximizing level of price and output the firm for
which we are given the data in Figure 9 is:
- incurring economic losses of $20.
- earning economic profits of $50.
- earning economic profits of $70.
- earning economic profits of $15.
- earning exactly 0 economic profit.
Answer to Question 24
- If entry is free in the industry to which the firm in Figure 9
belongs, how will long run equilibrium for this firm differ from
the situation shown in the graph?
- It will charge a higher price and produce a larger output.
- It will charge a higher price and produce a smaller output.
- It will charge a lower price and produce a smaller output.
- It will charge a lower price and produce a larger output.
- The firm is in long run equilibrium.
Answer to Question 25
- Suppose the restaurant industry Gotham City is monopolistically
competitive. In order to run a successful restaurant in Gotham
City it is necessary to have a liquor license. Suppose successful
restaurants can expect to earn economic profits of $10,000 per
year, forever. Suppose that once you have a liquor license in
Gotham city you can keep it for ever, bequeath it to your heirs,
or sell it. If you believe that there is no risk associated with
the restaurant business in Gotham and if you think the interest
rate will remain at 5% forever, approximately what is a liquor
license worth?
- $10,000
- $500
- its value is infinite since it's good forever.
- $200,000
- $50,000
Answer to Question 26
- A profit maximizing monopolist finds that its annual liability
insurance premium will be increased by a significant amount. The
most likely response is that:
- the firm will not change its production behavior.
- the firm will lower its marginal and average costs to increase
profits.
- the firm will advertise to increase demand thus restoring its
profits.
- the firm reduce price and increase output.
- the firm increase price and reduce output.
Answer to Question 27
Figure 10
- In Figure 10 an industry is depicted that was initially perfectly
competitive with industry demand curve D and industry supply curve
Spc . The firms in the industry all merge to convert the industry
to a monopoly, with MCm as the single firm's marginal cost curve. What area is the total
producer's surplus for the monopoly?
- 0 H PO
- P2 F H PO
- P1 G F P2
- P2 F G 0
- P1 G 0
Answer to Question 28
- What area in Figure 10 represents the deadweight loss that results
from monopolization of this industry?
- F H I
- G H F
- PO H G P1
- P2 F H P0$\
- I H G
Answer to Question 29
- Which of the following would not be a source of inefficient market
outcomes?
- monopoly power.
- externalities.
- imperfect information.
- profits.
- collusion to reduce output.
Answer to Question 30
- One of the primary arguments for allowing natural monopolies to
exist rather than forcing an industry to be competitive with many
small firms is that:
- it is generally believe that monopolies produce higher quality
products than would many small firms.
- consumers prefer not having to decide which firm is best.
- total costs of producing the same amount of output would be much
higher if produced by many small firms.
- its easier to regulate one large firm than many small ones.
- collusion is easily prevented in monopoly.
Answer to Question 31
- Suppose the airlines industry has been accused of price fixing
by sending coded communications to each other about whether they
want prices to go up, down or stay the same. If true, the airlines:
- would be tacitly colluding.
- would be explicitly colluding.
- would be operating in the best interest of the consumer.
- would be effectively merged.
- would be practicing predatory pricing.
Answer to Question 32
- Which of the following is an important loophole in The Clayton
Antitrust Act of 1914?
- It did not prevent anticompetitive or monopolizing mergers through
stock or share purchases.
- It did not prevent anticompetitive price discrimination.
- It did not prevent anticompetitive tying contracts
- It did not prevent anticompetitive or monopolizing mergers through
assets purchases.
- It did not prevent directors of one company from being directors
of another company in the same industry.
Answer to Question 33
- Suppose that an industry faces a constant long run average total
cost of $10 per unit. Under perfect competition, total industry
sales will be 500 units per year. Under monopoly, the industry
sells 100 units of output at a price of $30 for each unit. The
cost of monopolization in this industry is: (Hint: the answer
is the area of a triangle)
- $2,000 per year
- $3,000 per year
- $4,000 per year
- $8,000 per year
- cannot be computed with the given information.
Answer to Question 34
- A monopolist will produce a socially efficient level of output
if it:
- sets marginal revenue equal to marginal cost.
- produces where price equals average fixed cost.
- practices perfect price discrimination.
- produces where marginal revenue is negative.
- produces where price equals average total cost.
Answer to Question 35
- Suppose you own a furniture store. You place an order for tables
with BigTime furniture, but are told that you cannot carry the
tables unless you also carry their line of sofas. BigTime would
be in violation of the:
- Sherman Anti-Trust Act for attempting to monopolize the furniture
industry.
- Sherman Anti-Trust Act for price discrimination.
- Clayton Act for attempting to establish an exclusive dealing contract.
- Clayton Act for attempting to establish a tying contract.
- Clayton Act for attempting to establish a requirements contract.
Answer to Question 36
Figure 11
- If the firm for which we have the data depicted in Figure 11 is
a monopoly and the government decides to regulate the price and
output of the firm, the price quantity pair that will be closest
to the allocatively efficient level but which will not require that the firm be subsidized will be:
- a price of $12 and a quantity of 40.
- a price of $35 and a quantity of 18.
- a price of $18 and a quantity of 18.
- a price of $30 and a quantity of 20.
- a price of $6 and a quantity of 50.
Answer to Question 37