Home
Outline
Chapter 1
A E G S D
Chapter 2
A E G S D
Chapter 3
A E G S D
Chapter 4
A E G S D
Chapter 5
A E G S D
Chapter 6
A E G S D
Chapter 7
A E G S D
Chapter 8
A E G S D
Chapter 9
A E G S D
Chapter 10
A E G S D
Chapter 11
A E G S D
Chapter 12
A E G S D
Chapter 13
A E G S D
Chapter 14
A E G S D
Chapter 15
A E G S D
Chapter 16
A E G S D
Chapter 17
A E G S D
Chapter 18
A E G S D
Chapter 19
A E G S D
Chapter 20
A E G S D
Chapter 21
A E G S D
Chapter 22
A E G S D
Chapter 23
A E G S D
Chapter 24
A E G S D
Chapter 25
A E G S D
Chapter 26
A E G S D
Chapter 27
A E G S D
Chapter 28
A E G S D
Chapter 29
A E G S D
Chapter 30

Chapter 12: Production with Multiple Inputs

Static Graphics

Each graphic opens in a new browser window.

(Working Versions)

Graph 12.1abcdef

Profit Maximization in the 1 Input and 2 Input Model

Graph 12.2abc

Deriving 2-Dimensional Level Curves from a 3-Dimensional Picture of "Mount Nechyba"

Graph still in production; will be updated

Graph 12.3abc

Deriving 2-Dimensional Isoquants from a 3-Dimensional Production Frontier

Graph 12.4abc

Relatively More or Less Substitutability of Capital for Labor

Graph 12.5ab

Convex (a) and Non-Convex (b) Producer Choice Sets

Graph 12.6abcdef

Homothetic Isoquant Maps can represent Increasing, Constant or Decreasing Returns to Scale Production Processes

Graph 12.7abcd

Finding the Cheapest Way of Producing Different Units of Output

Graph 12.8abc

Cost Curves of "Typical" Production Processes

Graph 12.9

MC and AC under Increasing Returns to Scale Production

Graph 12.10ab

Quasiconcave functions can be Concave (a) but don't have to be (b)

Graph 12.11ab

Increasing Returns to Scale with (a) Diminishing MP and (b) Increasing MP

Graph 12.12abc

Inverse of (a) x(p,20,10), (b) l(5,w,10) and (c) k(5,20,r) when f(l,k)=20l2/5k2/5

Graph 12.13

"Duality" of Profit Maximization and Cost Minimization

Graph 12.14ab

Convexity (in Output Price) of the Profit Function and Hotelling's Lemma

Graph 12.15

Convexity (in Input Prices) of the Profit Function and Hotelling's Lemma